首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of Basel II on SME financing in Germany. An exploratory study of the impact of the new Basel Accord on SMES and financiers in Germany
【2h】

The effect of Basel II on SME financing in Germany. An exploratory study of the impact of the new Basel Accord on SMES and financiers in Germany

机译:《巴塞尔协议二》对德国中小企业融资的影响。新巴塞尔协议对德国中小企业和金融服务商影响的探索性研究

摘要

The New Capital Accord (henceforth, Basel II), is expected to imposeuddramatic changes on banks and other providers of corporate financing, asudwell as companies. Literature indicates that small and medium sizedudenterprises (henceforth SMEs), in general, and in particular German SMEsudseem to be affected: Germany has the highest SME density with SMEsudcomprising 99.6% of all corporations (IMF, 2008), these SMEs are highlyuddependent on banks for financing (see Jacobson et al, 2006). However, thereudis huge controversy in the literature concerning how these changes will look,udright before Basel II came into effect in the years 2007 / 2008 in theudEuropean Union. In order to explore this effect from a Post-Basel IIudperspective, the objective of this research project is to establish what effectudBasel II will have on corporate financing of SMEs in Germany.udThe high impact on SMEs (in Germany), combined with controversialudevidence from extant Pre-Basel II research, indicates a high relevance toudacademics and practitioners for this thesis. This thesis is probably the firstudfrom a Post-Basel II perspective which covers both the SMEs' as well asudthe financiers' perspective.udBased on a structured literature review using the comparative methodud(Peters, 1998) 'Most Different Systems' evidence is provided that there is noudconsistent picture regarding the effect of Basel II. Therefore, further researchudis needed to determine whether the effect in Germany is consistent, from audPost-Basel II perspective, with regards to the conditions which trigger certainudmechanisms, from a 'scientific realism' (Smith, 1998) perspective, becauseudthe literature indicates that 'positivist generalising' has limited validity.udBuilding on Creswell (2003), an 'exploratory sequential' design was createdudto test three initial hypotheses (as confirmation or refutation of a theory, see Gujarati, 2003:8): a multi-method design is best suited to the author'sudphilosophical stance of 'scientific realism' by means of triangulation (Robson,ud2002:174). The result of the initial quantitative phase is based on the analysisudof questionnaire data from 125 SMEs and financiers (banks, private equityudcompanies, family offices, providers of alternative means of financing) derivedudfrom a probabilistic sample frame in the fourth quarter of 2008. Mathematicaludmodels for SMEs and financiers regarding the three initial hypothesesudwere set-up and tested using the appropriate statistical tests. In order to limitudbias by means of a spill-over effect from the financial crises, controludquestions were used. The subsequent qualitative phase by means of semistructuredudelite interviews (Saunders et al, 2007:312) between March andudMay 2009 enabled a valid triangulation and provided in-depth insights intoudhow SMEs can cope best with Basel II. The purposive sample, of 17 'importantudcases', included company owners and top-level financier executives.udIn a conclusive quantitative and qualitative synopsis, the three initialudhypotheses were acknowledged. However, the qualitative in-depth analysisudby means of 'causal networks' (Miles and Huberman, 1994) led to anudamendment of the hypotheses as follows:ud1. Corporate finance has become different for SMEs because the 'houseudbank principle' has changed to a 'core bank principle' due to Basel II.udShopping around regarding credits will be more difficult which makesudfinancing more difficult. This could be overcompensated by major SMEs,udby using non-credit corporate financing which leads to a reduction of theud'house bank' principle.ud2. SMEs can cope best with the effect when they:uda) proactively engage in rating and improve the parameters, orudb) they adjust their strategy as stated in hypothesis 3.ud3. Financiers (especially non-bank financiers) will engage in SME corporateudfinance when they have a sound financial basis / management and whenudthey adjust their strategy in terms of growth with the aim of niche marketudleadership and when they open up for exit strategies.
机译:预计新资本协议(此后称为巴塞尔协议II)将对银行和其他公司融资提供者(包括公司)施加 d戏剧性变化。文献表明,中小型企业普遍受到影响,特别是德国中小企业受到影响:德国的中小企业密度最高,中小企业占所有企业的99.6%(IMF,2008年),这些中小企业高度依赖银行融资(见Jacobson等,2006)。然而,在巴塞尔协议II于2007/2008年在欧盟生效之前,有关这些变化的表象的争议很大。为了从后巴塞尔协议II的角度探讨这种影响,本研究项目的目的是确定udBasel II会对德国中小型企业的公司融资产生何种影响。对德国中小型企业的高影响,结合现有的巴塞尔协议II的有争议的证据,表明该论文与学界和从业者高度相关。本论文可能是《巴塞尔协议后II》观点中的第一个 ud,涵盖了中小企业和金融家的观点。 ud基于使用比较方法的结构化文献综述 ud(Peters,1998年)系统提供的证据表明,关于巴塞尔协议II的效果没有不一致的画面。因此,需要进一步的研究来从巴塞尔协议Ⅱ的角度确定德国的影响是否一致,从“科学现实主义”的角度(Smith,1998)来考虑触发某些机械机制的条件,因为 udthe文献表明'实证主义概括'的有效性有限。 ud在Creswell(2003)的基础上,创建了一个'exploratory sequence'设计,以检验三个初始假设(作为对理论的确认或反驳,请参见Gujarati,2003: 8):一种多方法设计最适合作者通过三角测量的“科学现实主义”的 udophistic立场(Robson, ud2002:174)。初始量化阶段的结果基于来自第四季度概率样本框架的 ud来自125家中小企业和金融机构(银行,私募股权 ud公司,家族办公室,替代融资手段的提供者)的问卷调查数据 udud (2008年)。建立了针对中小企业和金融家的关于三个初始假设的数学 udmodel ud模型,并使用适当的统计检验进行了检验。为了通过金融危机的溢出效应限制 udbias,使用了control udquestion。随后的定性阶段通过2009年3月至2009年5月的半结构化 udelite访谈(Saunders等人,2007:312)实现了有效的三角剖分,并提供了深入的了解 udud中小企业如何最好地应对Basel II。目的样本来自17个“重要案件”,包括公司所有者和高层金融执行官。 ud在结论性的定量和定性提要中,确认了三个初始假说。但是,通过“因果网络”进行的定性深入分析(Miles和Huberman,1994)导致对假设的修正,如下所示:ud1。由于中巴塞尔协议II,“内部 udbank原则”已更改为“核心银行原则”,因此中小企业的公司融资方式已经变得不同。 ud围绕信贷的购物将更加困难,这使得 udf融资更加困难。这可能会被主要的中小型企业过度补偿, ud通过使用非信贷公司融资,从而导致“ ud'house bank”原则的减少。 ud2。中小企业可以最好地应对以下情况: uda)积极参与评级并改善参数,或者 udb)如假设3中所述调整其战略。 ud3。金融家(尤其是非银行金融家)在拥有健全的财务基础/管理,以利基市场领导力为目标调整其增长战略并在开放市场时,将从事中小企业的公司金融业务。策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schmid Bernhard;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号